Hermeneutics and Philosophers

The word hermeneutics is derived from the Greek hermeneuo, which means, to interpret, to put into words, expressed in a language. Many times, it is synonymous with exegesis, explanation, and interpretation. In connection with the explanation of Scripture, these both words atomic number 18 equivalent to the eighteenth century, when the word hermeneutics assumes various shades of meaning according to the various schools and philosophical theories.Today we prefer to prefigure exegesis to that of the biblical text analysis intended to discover what the author meant to his contemporaries, and hermeneutics to which the aforesaid(prenominal) text tells us today in a different mount and in a comprehensible modern man. For Ricoeur, the reflective philosophy is scatter of materialisation on itself, to establish the I of thought as first fair play I think, therefore I am. But Ricoeur thinks that reflection is not intuition of me because the I think is just an abstract truth and empty. The self can only be found in their objectification.Therefore, enjoin that the reflection can only be understood as the case to apprehend the Self of Ego cogito in the mirror of its objects, their works and at last for their actions. The lives lost and forgotten I himself to his works, which manifests his desire and effort to exist. The debate should not then go straight to the I provided to their deeds and actions, which wedded its ambiguous nature, should be interpreted. Thus, philosophy becomes reflexive hermeneutic philosophy or interpretive. Lonergan and doubting Thomas were two philosophers that were in a same point.For example, both were students of theology. Aquinas believes that publics are directed toward the transcendent God as the last goal of their lives, and this transcendent goal is a beyond the power of human reason to grasp (p. 47). Lonergan understands the relationship between critical reason and trustingness as central to the practice of theology in the modern world (p. 64). St. Thomas Aquinas see that theology does not seek an essence, but a living being who constantly challenges the man, instead of being presented as an object, is the Unknown is revealed in the vision-oriented faith.To address the issue thus appeals to the view that is taken into eternal bliss, in eschatology, which keeps the vital tension between theological conversation and praxis logos. The method according to Lonergan, not a set of rules to be followed strictly, but rather a framework to foster creativity and collaboration, by which all the operations that are necessary for the development of theology are susceptible to be printed, and giving mutually intertwined cumulative and progressive results.