A Reflection on Plan Evaluation

Topic PLAN EVALUATION condemnation In this topic contrive military rank, I now understand wherefore we always have visitors from the division, region and even from the central office visit our school to evaluate and observe how things are being carried out. In my terce years of service in the government, there was no school year that there was no military rank. Seeing them holding any(prenominal) checklists made us tremble while asking us things and observing our classes.Being new in the system I wondered and ask myself, is it proper that later military rank they giveing have feed backing so that we go forth be equal to know what areas we need to improve and what are their suggestions for the betterment of our school and children. That is bingle thing that I had observed that after evaluation, results of the observation were not discussed for avail sake. As I go over with my topic in plan evaluation I was enlightened why they regularly conduct evaluation and why we we re not informed about the results of the evaluation.It was then that the results were for the policy makers, class directors and direct program staff consumption only. If given a incident in the future to plan for an evaluation, I would suggest that any corrections or any part of the program that need some improvement, during the encroachment of evaluation, feed baking should took place right after the evaluation so that the implementers of the program (teachers) will be able to know where they need some polishing that will be congruent with the objectives of the program.During the design of the evaluation address it would be better if local persons and all those who are involved in the implementation of the program will be present during the discussion termination so that opinions are expressed and be validated, for everybody has its part to the success of the program. on the whole evaluation plans should trace both participants and stakeholders, and should include the rele vant items developed in the evaluation process.In the monitoring aspect, I would go with the combination of performance evaluation and evaluation done on a continuing program because this will measure the impact of the program on the society or on the people. This is done to improve continuously the performance of the program period after period and in the same way this will enable planners identify shortcomings and earth-closet devise remedial actions while the plan/program is facilitate in progress.Thorough studies should be done on what evaluation design will be best applicable to a program and I would propose applying it or testing first the evaluation design on sensitive population prior to the piloting. Through this, monitoring and evaluation will be manageable and any unexpected occurrences in the program will be observed right away and be given solution.Revisions of the program can be done as early as this stage. Lastly, ensure that the evaluation will be as fair, accura te, and effective as possible. The use of detail tools can help in the success of the project like yearbook reports, quarterly or monthly reports from the monitoring system, and anything else should equally agreed betwixt the organization and the evaluation team.