Learning Difficulties Encountered By Efl Students English Language Essay

Learning Difficulties Encountered By Efl Students English Language EssayRecently, comprehend has gained to a greater extent(prenominal) than and more oversight in impertinent address acquirement. In acquirement a abroad row, it is suggested that the most important step should write down with an effort to listen. (Rubin Thompson, 1994) Listening provides input for learners to cultivate encyclopaedism occur and listen exercises draw learners attention to untried forms in quarrel, much(prenominal) as new vocabulary items. (Rost, 1994) Listening back tooth be regarded as a needful skill in the diagnosing and preparation of foreign delivery students and asshole plain be served as a good predictor of words achievement. In consequence, earshot inclusion acts as a pivotal berth in foreign language learning. (Oxford, 1993)In this essay, three issues atomic number 18 discussed. eff 1 states sense of hearing exhaustingies in second language acquisition. Underwood (19 94), Chiang and Dunkel (1992) and Rubin and Thompson (1994)s placement microscope stage are discussed. Issue 2 proposes taxonomies of the factors affecting perceive difficulties. Boyle (1984), Yagang (1993) and Rubin (1994) s point of view of the factors affecting perceive inclusion are referred to. Issue 3 mentions studies in listening difficulties of L2 attenders in foreign countries. Tauroza and Allisons (Rubin, 1994) say is about spoken language rate. Boyle (1984)s study is factors most oft mentioned in listening comprehension. Lynch (1997)s study is a case study of a intermediate-level learners progress in listening comprehension. Goh (2000)s study discusses listening comprehension capers.BODYChapter 1 Listening difficulties in second language acquisitionUnderwoods (1994) point of viewUnderwood (1994) determine seven potential difficulties in listening comprehension as (1) omit of control over the speed at which vocalizers speak, (2) non world open to get thin gs repeated, (3) the listeners express vocabulary, (4) failure to get it on the signals, (5) worrys of interpretation, (6) in top executive to concentrate, (7) established learning habits. Many language learners believe that the greatest hindrance with listening comprehension is that the listener merchantmannot control how quickly a speaker speaks. (p7)They feel that the utterances vaporize before they advise sort them out.http//nccuir.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/33414/7/95100307.pdfThey are so particular working out the blottoing of one part of what they nail that they except the side by side(p) part. Another difficulty is that listener is not al fashions in a position to get the speaker to repeat an utterance. This is particularly presumable to be the case when students are on the edge of conversation after-school(prenominal) the sortroom. For people listening to a foreign language, an unknown word tin be like a suddenly dropped barrier causing them to chec kout and think about the meaning of the word and thus making them suffer the next part of the quarrel (p 17). And students need to learn to listen for the signals in order to be able to connect the various utterances in the way the speaker intended them to be connected. (p18) Students who are unacquainted(predicate) with the con text edition whitethorn have considerable difficulty in interpreting the wrangle they hear even if they stop understand their surface meaning. (p19). Inability to concentrate mass be ca gived by a number of things, but in listening work it is a major problem, beca commit even the shortest break in attention sack seriously impair comprehension. (p19) Outside factors may swell make concentration difficult, too. An inferior machine or poor enter eject make it truly hard for the students. As for establishing leaning habits, when the learner can more readily accept the frustrations involved, he bequeath be more prepared to strive for a partial and inco mplete understanding of what is beingness said. (pp16-19)Rubin and Thompsons (1994) point of viewRubin and Thompson list three common problems in learning to listen to a foreign language. The first problem is that the speaker talks too fast. If the listener can not follow the speaker, the listener can let the speaker know that he is not following. He can ask for repetition and slowing down the speed, seeks clarification, rephrase, and repeat. The listener can gestate attention to intonation and tone of voice, focus on question haggle such(prenominal) as who, what and when and assume that the here and now are relevant. That is, the decry is directly related to the subject they have just been discussing. Assume that what a person says is directly related to something he or she is experiencing at that very minute. The second problem is that the listener is not getting anything out of foreign language TV and movies. If the listener could not understand the foreign language TV and m ovies, they should try to take control of his listening by predicting what he was likely to hear. For example, use visual clues and use his stage setting friendship. Anticipate info in a instalment by relying on your knowledge of what such a segment is likely to contain. Listeners could also use information from the segment itself and determine the genre of the segment. Knowing the genre of a segment will help you determine how best to approach it. For instance, if it is an interview, then concentrate on the questions. If it is a news report, a who, when, where dodge will work best. If it is a drama, look for the story line. Listeners could listen to familiar elements, listen to familiar-sounding words, listen to and shred down repeated words, learn to recognize numbers and learn to recognize proper names. The third problem is that the listener tends to stop listening when he hears an unfamiliar word or phrase. Many learners, particularly in the too soon stages of language lea rning, panic and lose their concentration when they hear an unfamiliar segment. As a result, they miss portions of the passage that powerfulness have helped clarify the unfamiliar word or segment. The listener should concentrate on familiar elements and concur listening. Understanding something is better than getting nothing at all. If you continue listening, chances are that you will comprehend at least some parts of the massage. It is feasible that the portions you missed were not very important after all.Chiang and Dunkels (1992) point of viewChiang and Dunkel (1992) pointed out that listeners comprehension in English may be frustrated by a number of cognitive and linguistic factors as well as academic and cultural issues, including (a) inability or lack of probability to engage in communicative interaction with the second/foreign language teacher or dun (b) inability to detect the main points of the babble out or to grasp the usual goals of particular genres of parley s ituation of which the discourse is a part (c) unfamiliarity with the structure and type of the discourse (d) inability to apprehend discourse markers and logical relationships in the English chit-chat (e) inability to comprehend lecture deliverance delivered at faster rates of speed (f) limited short-term memory for English input (g) failure to use appropriate cognitive or learning strategies (h) poor inference abilities in English (i) limited proficiency in English (j) lack of previous knowledge about the content of the spoken or written text and (k) inability to butt against L2 input devoid of speech modification such as elaborations or redundancies. Of these difficulties confronting L2 learners, Chiang and Dunkel explored the effect of three of them. The first situation was when the listeners had limited listening proficiency in English, the second situation was when they lacked prior knowledge about the topic of the L2 lecture, and the third situation was when they were not supplied with modified speech. The results revealed a significant interaction between prior knowledge and text type.Chapter 2 Taxonomy of the factors affecting L2 listening difficultiesBoyles (1984) three categories of factorsBoyle (1984) began with a survey of the factors most frequently mentioned in the literature on listening comprehension, including three categories of factors. The first fellowship referred to the listener factors, including experience in listening to the target language, usual background knowledge of the world, educational background and type of school, knowledge of the target language in its various aspects, memory, powers of analysis and selection and motivation and attitude of the listener to the speaker and to the message. The second categories, the speaker factors, contain language ability of the speaker native speaker-beginning level non-native speaker. Speakers production pronunciation, accent, variation, voice affect, too. Speed of delivery and presti ge and personality of the speaker count. The third category, factors in the clobber and medium, comprise difficulty of content and concept, especially if the material is abstract, abstruse, highly specialized or technical, drawn-out or poorly organized. Acoustic environment such as hurly burly and interference and amount of concord provided by gestures, visuals also have cast on listening comprehension.Yagangs (1993) four aspects of factorshttp//eca.state.gov/forum/vols/vol31/no1/p16.htmInstead of three categories, Yagang (1993) proposed that the sources of listening difficulties came mainly from the four aspects the message, the speaker, the listener, and the physical setting. The message factors comprised content and linguistic features. In content which is not well organized, listeners cannot predict what speakers are going to say. And if listening materials are made up of everyday conversation, they may contain a lot of colloquial expressions, such as guy for man. Students who have been undefendable mainly to formal or bookish English may not be familiar with these expressions. The speaker factors consists of redundant utterances, such as repetitions, false starts, re-phrasings, self-corrections, elaborations, tautologies, apparently meaningless entree such as I mean or you know and speakers personal factors such as their accents. Learners tend to be used to their teaching accent or to the standard variety of British or American English. They find it hard to understand speakers with other accents. The listener factors played a more important role in EFL students listening. For example, foreign language students might be not familiar enough with clich and collocations in English to predict a missing word or phrase. For example, they can not be expected to know that rosy often collocates with cheeks. EFL students might be lack of sociocultural, factual, and contextual knowledge of the target language. (Anderson and Lynch 1988).It can present an ob stacle to comprehension because language is used to express its culture. Factors in physical setting included noise, both background noises on the recording and environmental noises, could carry the listeners mind of the content of the listening passage. Listening material on tape or radio lacks visual and aural environmental clues. Not seeing the speakers body language and facial expressions makes it more difficult for the listener to understand the speakers meaning. Unclear sounds resulting from poor quality equipment can interfere with the listeners comprehension.Rubins (1994) five categories of factorsRubin (1994) classified these listening factors into five categories text, interlocutor, task, listener and process characteristics. textual matter characteristics referred to acoustic-temporal variables, acoustic-other variables and morphologic and syntactic modifications (including restatements). Acoustic-temporal variables are speech rate, pause phenomena, and hesitation. Acou stic-other variables are level of perception, stress and rhythmic patterning perception and L1 and L2 differences. Variables of morphological and syntactic modifications are redundancy, morphological complexity, word order and discourse markers. Text characteristics referred to text type. Visual support for texts is also an important variable. Interlocutor characteristics referred to variations in the speakers personal characteristics, such as gender, pronunciation, accent, expertness and so on. Listener characteristics are listeners language proficiency level, memory, attention, affect, age, gender, learning disabilities in L1, and background knowledge as well as aptitude, process skills, background biases, motivation, and confidence level. Process characteristics referred to how listeners interpret input in harm of what they know or identify what they dont know. Top-down, bottom-up and parallel processing is being examined in L2 contexts. Current views of listening comprehension propose that listeners actively process language input. Two types of processing have been discerned cognitive strategies and metacognitive strategies. Research on listening strategies includes work on several languages work contrasting strategy use at several proficiency levels work with interactive or transactional listening work with cognitive and metacognitive strategies work considering the relation of strategy use to text, task, and setting.Chapter 3 Studies in listening difficulties of L2 listeners in foreign countriesTauroza and Allisons ( )studyspeech rateGriffiths suggests that diametric language have different normal rates and the rates delimitate in studies using English can not be use exactly to studies of other languages. Most research quotes a normal speech rate of 165 to 180 words per minutes for native speakers of English. On the other hand, while Foulke reports a threshold (the rate at which comprehension begins to decrease rapidly) level between 250-275 w.p.m., o thers states that comprehension decreases as a drop dead of mental aptitude and difficulty level. Tauroza and Allison compare normal speed of British speakers for four types of speech. They found that while the mean for radio and interview speech events lies within the range of 160 to 190 w.p.m., the means for conversation and lecture categories are outside this range. The mean rate for conversation in words per minute was 210, while for lectures, 140. They note further that thirty-three percent of their lecture information was slower than 130 w.p.m. and twenty-three percent of the conversation data was faster than 220 w.p.m. The issue of normal speech rate is one that unflustered needs a great deal more research that takes into taradiddle all of the variables mentioned above. (Rubin, 1994)Boyles (1984) study-factors most frequently mentioned in listeningIn Boyles (1984) study, 30 teachers and 60 students in Hong Kong were asked to list the six factors which they considered the most important in aiding or hampering the effectiveness of listening comprehension. It was interesting to know that the students gave much more importance to vocabulary than teachers did. It was surprising that the students mentioned dickens factors, memory and concentration, barely mentioned by the teachers. In addition, the students considered that there was a possible relationship between their schooling habits and their listening comprehension, which was not mentioned by the teachers. On the other hand, the teacher seemed to place the linguistic factors more sophisticatedly. The teacher would specify the factors as ability to separate up clues, complex syntactical structures, stress and intonation and interference from Chinese. On the contrary, the students just indicated that the lack of general language ability or the difficulties in English listening comprehension.Lynchs (1997) study-a case study of an intermediate-level learners progressLynch (1997) conducted an ethnogra phic study of a Japanese student who attended English language courses at the Institute for Applied Language Studies, the all one victorious an undergraduate course in economics at the University of Edinburgh. His lots on the listening tests were relatively low in comparison with his reading and grammar scores with the other students in class. A number of possible reasons were found to rationalise his difficulties in listening comprehension. First, he was the youngest member in his class so that he was unwilling to engage in negotiation with his seniors. Second, he was the only undergraduate student with an economic background in his English class so that he viewed himself as insufficient in some general background knowledge. Third, he joined Course 3 in the EAP program, skipping the introductory class, Course 1 and 2. Therefore, he thought he needed more quantify to get used to negotiate with others in English. Fourth, his lowest listening score disappointed him greatly. The perceptions of the subject had made a substantial run on his English learning.Gohs (2000) study-listening comprehension problemsGoh (2000) investigated the comprehension problems of second language listeners in a cognitive perspective. She identified real-time listening difficulties faced by 40 Chinese undergraduates and examined their difficulties within the three-phase model of language comprehension proposed by Anderson. (1995). The data were collected from learners self-reports in their diaries, semi-structure interviews and immediate retrospective verbalizations. The data revealed 10 problems that occurred during the cognitive process phases of perception, parsing, and utilization. She also, made a comprehension between two groups, high ability listeners and low ability listeners. Each group consisted of viii students selected according to their grades in a post-instruction standardized proficiency test, the SLEP test of educational Testing Service 1991. She found that listen ers with highly ability and low ability both had a perception problem with recognizing words they knew. Another problem they both shared was parsing problem that they quickly forgot what they thought they had understood. In addition to these two problems, high ability listeners inform a utilization problem that they were often unable to extract the meaning out of the message even if they had understood all the words. On the other hand, low ability listeners reported another perception problem that they often did not hear the next part of a text because they spent too much time thinking about what they had just heard.