The story of Jack the Ripper Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

The story of Jack the Ripper - Research subject ExampleOver the years the mystery has deepened to the degree that the truth is almost totally obscured. Innumerable fix stories, pamphlets, books, plays, films, and even musicals have dramatized and distorted the facts to such a degree that the fiction is publicly accepted much than the reality.Suffice to say genuine suspects are far fewer than the prolific authors of the genre would have us believe. In fact, to reduce them to only those with a genuine claim having been nominated by contemporary patrol policemans, we are left with a mere four. They areDr. Francis J. Tumblety, 56 Years old, an American quack doctor, who was arrested in November 1888 for offenses of gross(a) indecency, and fled the country later the same month, having obtained bail at a very high price.The world-class collar of these suspects were nominated by Sir Melville Macnaghten, who joined the Metropolitan Police as Assistant Chief Constable, second in comman d of the Criminal Investigation Department (C.I.D.) at Scotland Yard in June 1889. They were named in a state dated 23 February 1894, although there is no evidence of contemporary police suspicion against the three at the time of the murders. Indeed, Macnaghtens report contains several odd factual errors.Kosminski was certainly favored by the head of the C.I.D. Dr. ... Dr. Robert Anderson, and the officer in charge of the case, Chief Inspector Donald Swanson. Druitt appears to have been Macnaghtens preferred candidate, whilst the fact that Ostrog was arrested and incarcerated before the report was compiled leaves the historian puzzling why he was included as a viable suspect in the first place. The fourth suspect, Tumblety, was stated to have been amongst the suspects at the time of the murders and to my mind a very likely one, by the ex-head of the Special Branch at Scotland Yard in 1888, ex-Detective Chief Inspector John George Littlechild. He confided his thoughts in a letter da ted 23 September 1913, to the criminological journalist and author George R Sims.For a list of viable suspects, they have not inspired any uniform confidence in the minds of those well-versed in the case.Indeed, arguments can be made against all of them being the culprit, and no hard evidence exists against any of them. What is obvious is the fact that the police were at no stage in a position to prove a case against anyone, and it is highly unlikely a positive case will ever be proved.