Background on the Controversy Surrounding Freedom of Choice versus Essay

Background on the Controversy Surrounding license of Choice versus Smoking Ban - Essay ExampleVII. Smoking manly is another major answer because smokers atomic number 18 not only hurting themselves as they smoke in public places but also damaging the health of other surrounding non-smokers. A. Statistics on Passive Smoker DeathsB. Chronic health problems traced to nonoperational smoking.VIII. Smoking is uncontrollable and is spreading at an extremely fast stride, due to both peer impel and advertising.A. Teen smoking statisticsB. Causes and consequences of underage smoking.IX. Advertisement is another factor which has greatly contributed to the fast growing rate of smoking among teens. A. Economics of tobacco advertisementB. Proliferation of tobacco ads.C. Consequence of tobacco advertisementsX. The harms of smoking are much(prenominal) that it is imperative to pass a ban on public smoking as a representation of discouraging the habit and limiting its harms, irrespective of arguments claiming that doing so would be a violation of inalienable piece freedoms.In social, political and legal environments which uphold freedom of election and personal liberty, the decision of well-nigh governments and topical anaesthetic authorities to ban smoking in public places has been a subject of controversy and debate. In chemical answer to Scotlands decision to ban smoking in public places, Gillian Bowditch expressed tinge over the way that governments are increasingly using the health concern and public welfare argument as an excuse to invade personal freedom, reduce freedom of choice and create an artificially homogenous society. This is not an isolated reaction as in response to the pouched rat federal governments proposal to ban smoking in public areas, Craig Westover argues that this is contrary to the US Constitution and against the actually principles that the United States was...In reaction to Scotlands decision to ban smoking in public places, Gill ian Bowditch expressed concern over the way that governments are increasingly using the health concern and public welfare argument as an excuse to invade personal freedom, reduce freedom of choice and create an artificially homogenous society. This is not an isolated reaction as in response to the Minnesotan federal governments proposal to ban smoking in public areas, Craig Westover argues that this is contrary to the US Constitution and against the very principles that the United States was founded upon. The US Constitution and the countrys founding principles emphasise the inalienable right to individual liberty and freedom of choice, with the implication being that the government, whether local, national or federal, does not possess the right to prohibit smoking in publicly owned properties (Westover). It is therefore apparent that the ban on smoking has been interpreted by some as a dangerous transgression against individual liberty and freedom of choice.